Question for Richard

By Victoria Krouse in 29 Sep 2020 | 21:32
Victoria Krouse

Victoria Krouse

Student
Posts: 6
Member since: 4 May 2020
Where may I access your cacao monograph?! Thank you ~ Victoria Krouse
29 Sep 2020 | 21:32
0 Likes
ms.hannah.k

ms.hannah.k

Student
Posts: 1
Member since: 25 Jun 2020
Hi Richard: I had asked about Conopholis americana. I saw it for the first time in proliferation this year. I'm interested in how it would be categorized. I understand it's a non-photosynthesizing parasitic plant. Does that mean it's in the same category as ghost pipe? Also, you had discussed soil remediators. I always wonder how these should be composted/disposed in a responsible way. For instance I would love to see our government (dream) use hemp to remediate our chemically damaged soil but then how would the hemp be dealt when finished? Utilitaria - rope, building block or can you compost but not use on food? Thanks!
30 Sep 2020 | 01:55
0 Likes
Becky Russell

Becky Russell

Student
Posts: 56
Member since: 21 Feb 2020
I have the Peterson Field Guide to Medicinal Plants and Herbs, and Peterson Field Guide to Edible Wild Plants. Are these adequate field guides, or is it important to get one on your list? Thanks. Becky Russell
1 Oct 2020 | 02:01
0 Likes
Eileen

Eileen

Staff
Posts: 215
Member since: 16 Dec 2019
From Richard: These are fine to have - not my favorites but I do own them and used to use them a bit more than I do now. The main piece of feedback I would give is that both of these focus on a subset of plants - the edible ones, the medicinal ones - rather than serving as general field guides for i.d. of plants more generally. My advice is if you are into foraging or wild medicine harvesting, or field i.d. is to get field guides and acquire skills to identify anything, not just the medicinal or edible ones. Then you really won't make any mistakes!
2 Oct 2020 | 17:00
0 Likes
Eileen

Eileen

Staff
Posts: 215
Member since: 16 Dec 2019
From Richard For Conopholis: I didn't recognize the name when mentioned during class but I have come across this plant in the past - not very locally to me but a bit further south from where I am. Correct that it is non-photosynthesizing. Calling it parasitic is a bit more "loaded" - it is taking carbohydrates from the mycorrhizal network and therefore from other plants, so technically that can be called parasitic. It doesn't mean though that it is necessarily detrimental in any way to those plants. I have never looked into it per se. I would begin with a google scholar search which often reveals lots of research! On remediation - I know for instance that plant material used to mediate radioactive soil after Chernobly had to be treated as radioactive hazardous waste. The same with say fungus or plants used to draw out lead in remediation efforts. It's an interesting idea to use as rope or building etc. and something like that could be possible, but I would be concerned exposure could happen unintentionally. For instance most lead exposure comes from paint - so I wouldn't want us to repeat mistakes from the past!
2 Oct 2020 | 17:29
0 Likes

Report

Please describe about the report short and clearly.

GDPR

When you visit any of our websites, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and manage your preferences. Please note, that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.